Thoughts

Why Political Science Majors Excel at Marketing

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

Marketing isn’t just about selling products or services; it’s about building trust and moving people to act. As a political science major turned brand marketer, I see the connection every day. Political science is a training ground for persuasion, storytelling, and strategy — the same core skills that drive great marketing.

My years studying campaigns, court cases, and historical movements weren’t just academic. They were the foundation for understanding how to influence thought, inspire action, and create lasting impact.

A Crash Course in Persuasion

In political science, you learn how movements grow, policies shape societies, and leaders rally support. Every campaign tells a story designed to build confidence and drive action. In marketing, the same principles apply.

Political campaigns, at their core, are brand campaigns. A candidate starts with nothing but their name and an idea. Success depends on creating a message that resonates, building trust, and mobilizing people. When I studied this, it wasn’t just about watching politicians shake hands or give speeches. It was about understanding how they did it. What made a message stick? How did they earn trust? Why did people not just vote, but show up, donate, and fight for them?

Good marketing follows the same rules. It’s not about features or slogans; it’s about a story that connects on a deeper level and inspires action. Whether the goal is to win an election or launch a product, the formula remains consistent: craft a clear message, build belief, and make it impossible to ignore.

The Power of Words

Constitutional law was one of the most fascinating areas of my studies. Every word in a court opinion carries weight, setting precedent that can last for generations. Reading dissents was my favorite. They weren’t just about arguing a point. They were bold, passionate attempts to influence the future.

That same precision with language is essential in marketing. Words matter. A tagline, a product description, or a single sentence in an ad can shift how people see your brand. The ability to communicate clearly and compellingly often makes the difference between being remembered or forgotten. In marketing, as in constitutional law, it’s not just what you say — it’s how you say it and why it matters.

Propaganda as Branding

Some of the biggest propaganda movements in history weren’t just political. They were massive branding campaigns. Colors, symbols, slogans, coordinated events — all designed to create recognition and loyalty. The same tools show up in modern marketing.

Take a historic movement like the civil rights struggle, or a less savory one like World War II-era propaganda. Each had a strategy built on simplicity and clarity. They used visuals, phrases, and calls to action to create momentum and inspire people. It’s not coincidence. It’s strategy. And that’s the same playbook marketing teams use to build brands today.

Politicians as Case Studies

Let’s be real: most politicians aren’t extraordinary thinkers. What they excel at is communication. They connect with people. They build trust. They understand how to inspire action. As political science majors, we studied these traits in depth — not just as spectators, but as analysts.

Campaigns gave us a blueprint for persuasion. They taught us to look at what worked and why. It wasn’t just about analyzing speeches or ads; it was about understanding human behavior. Good marketing works the same way. It’s about testing ideas, watching what resonates, and adapting until the message clicks.

My Experience in Political Science

Studying political science taught me to think critically and act strategically. I read landmark court cases, dissected movements, and studied how governments shaped the world. It wasn’t just about theory. It was about understanding how people respond to ideas and why some messages succeed where others fail.

Marketing took those same lessons and applied them to the real world. Whether building brands, launching products, or creating campaigns, the process is familiar. Research. Test. Refine. Understand the audience. Communicate with purpose. These are not abstract skills; they are practical tools I use every day.

Jaguar Release Day

1024 574 Michael Kraabel

Today isn’t just another day for Jaguar—it’s potentially the day. The iconic carmaker is poised at a crossroads: one path could redefine their legacy, and the other might cement the idea that they’ve missed their moment. I’ll be live-blogging the action as it unfolds, sharing the wins, the stumbles, and everything in between. Whether you’re a brand strategist, a marketing enthusiast, or just curious about how legacy brands navigate reinvention, this is the space to watch.

Buckle up—it’s going to be an interesting ride.

Launch Day – 7:42 PM CST. – My Initial Reactions

Review of the New Jaguar Launch in Miami

I’m conflicted. Jaguar’s long-awaited launch in Miami was one of those moments that made me question where this iconic brand is headed. The car itself? It’s fine. From a design perspective, it’s sleek and modern, but for a concept car, it didn’t leave me awestruck. And maybe that’s part of my problem—the car felt secondary to the event’s overblown theatrics, which were supposed to redefine Jaguar’s identity but missed the mark.

The real frustration lies in the branding and marketing surrounding this launch. It felt… off-brand. Jaguar has always been synonymous with effortless sophistication—timeless luxury wrapped in performance. But the event leaned so hard into gimmicky, buzzword-laden showmanship that it cheapened the experience. It’s as if Jaguar wanted to be everything to everyone, instead of leaning into its unique DNA.

Here’s the kicker: the person unveiling this supposedly game-changing product line wasn’t the CEO, an engineer, or a driver—it was the Creative Director. Now, don’t get me wrong, I respect the role of a CD immensely (it’s my own background, after all). Creative Directors are crucial to shaping a brand’s story, especially during a pivot. But putting them front and center for such a seismic moment felt odd—almost like Jaguar itself isn’t confident about what it’s selling.

This decision gives me an uneasy vibe, as if the brand is relying more on a creative persona than on the strength of its product. That’s dangerous ground for a company with a legacy as rich as Jaguar’s. When a product is truly innovative, it speaks for itself—you don’t need to overcompensate with fluff.

Despite my misgivings, I have to admit: the car does look good. It’s not groundbreaking, but it’s undeniably Jaguar in its design. That said, Jaguar’s future feels like it’s teetering on a tightrope between chasing trends and staying true to its core. For now, I’m left wondering whether this new direction is the evolution of a classic or just another brand trying too hard to reinvent itself.

Time will tell, but Jaguar’s next steps need to be bold and authentic. If they can find that balance, they might just reclaim their magic.

Launch Day – 7:27 PM CST.

Launch Day – 6:50 PM CST.

A message from JLR CEO – Adrian Mardell

As JLR continues to deliver a robust financial performance, our strong foundations enable us to invest for the future and progress our Reimagine strategy.​

Today we get a glimpse of how that investment is coming to life through the reimagination of Jaguar as it embraces a new era.​

As is expected of Jaguar, Type 00 is bold. It is original. It copies nothing.​

The long bonnet, sweeping roofline and fastback profile are details that to me, recapture the emotion and magic that I felt when I sat behind the wheel of an E-type for the first time. It is this magic that the team is bringing to life through the dramatic reimagining of the brand and the beautiful Jaguars to come. ​

This is Jaguar. Our original British luxury brand, unmatched in its heritage, artistry and magnetism. We hope current fans will join us on this exciting journey as we also look to inspire a new generation. I am confident it will be a British design icon.​

Launch Day – 4:45 PM CST.

Jaguar’s Rebrand: Copy Nothing (Except What Everyone Recognizes)

Jaguar’s new rebrand boldly claims to “copy nothing,” but the execution tells a different story. Let’s start with the choice of pink for a Jaguar—a decision that feels more like an unintentional homage to the Pink Panther than a statement of originality. While pink isn’t inherently wrong for a luxury brand, it demands a razor-sharp context. For Jaguar, a name synonymous with sleek aggression and poised sophistication, the color choice comes off as cheeky at best and jarringly off-brand at worst. It’s as if they wanted to be bold but lost sight of whether the move reinforced or diluted their identity.

Copy Nothing? Really?

Jaguar’s claim to “copy nothing” is a clever tagline—but one that struggles under scrutiny. The campaign heavily borrows the shadowy, rebellious vibes of Apple’s iconic “1984” commercial, complete with the same anti-establishment undertones. The problem? Apple’s ad was groundbreaking because it positioned a product as the antidote to conformity. Jaguar is a luxury automotive brand, not a Silicon Valley disruptor. The attempt to echo Apple’s energy feels more like a borrowed costume than a natural fit for the brand’s DNA.

And let’s not overlook the elephant—or Rolls-Royce—in the room. From the refined simplicity of their design language to a certain minimalist elegance, Jaguar’s new aesthetic bears more than a passing resemblance to Rolls-Royce’s latest models. “Copy nothing” starts to sound a little ironic when the product itself seems to lean heavily on cues from a direct competitor. Imitation isn’t a bad thing when it’s done right, but it undermines the “we’re different” claim they’re staking their future on.

A Missed Opportunity

Jaguar’s heritage is a treasure trove of iconic moments, from its legendary racing success to its sleek, unmistakable designs. Yet, instead of finding a modern way to amplify that legacy, this rebrand feels scattered—trying too hard to chase trends rather than setting them. Originality doesn’t mean ignoring what came before; it means building on it in a way that only you can. Pink panthers and borrowed ideas aren’t going to cut it for a brand that should own boldness, sophistication, and timeless luxury.

It’s not too late for Jaguar to find its voice. But first, it needs to ask itself: are we chasing cool, or are we leading the pack? Right now, the answer seems unclear.

Launch Day – 4:36 PM CST.

Jaguar’s Rebrand: The Roar That’s Dividing the Room

Jaguar’s recent rebrand has sparked plenty of chatter, but not exactly the kind that fuels admiration. Responses so far can be summed up in two distinct camps:

  1. The Critics Who Aren’t Convinced
    This group, made up largely of automotive and marketing enthusiasts, isn’t buying what Jaguar is selling. Some are lamenting what feels like a departure from the brand’s iconic heritage, while others see the rebrand as missing the mark for luxury or innovation. Instead of elevating Jaguar’s image, they argue, the rebrand seems to have taken a detour into the generic.
  2. The Contrarians and Opportunists
    On the flip side, there’s a vocal segment of people defending the rebrand—not necessarily because they love it, but because they’re zigging where others are zagging. Mixed into this group are opportunists pitching themselves as problem-solvers for Jaguar’s leadership. Whether they genuinely believe in the rebrand or are angling for a shot at future projects, their enthusiasm feels more strategic than heartfelt.

While the buzz shows Jaguar is still a brand worth talking about, the lack of a unified positive response suggests this rebrand isn’t quite firing on all cylinders. For a company with Jaguar’s legacy, the stakes are high—let’s see if this rebrand’s polarizing reception leads to any course corrections or just becomes another chapter in their evolving story.

Launch Day – 1:32 PM CST.

It’s hard to tell if the photos leaked below are real or not.  Nobody from Jaguar has responded.  Quite frankly, they look like bad models from a 1990’s computer game.  If this is what Jaguar has really released, they need to evaluate what business they are in.  As a car person, who ran a car company, this is absolute garbage.  I say that with the deepest respect and hope that it’s just meant to generate buzz.  Bad buzz is not good buzz, no matter what anyone says.

Here’s the most recent concept car releases on cochespias.net:

Launch Day – 10:25 AM CST.

Jaguar is set to unveil its Design Vision Concept today at Miami Art Week, marking a significant step in its transformation into an all-electric luxury brand. This concept car previews a four-door grand tourer, the first in Jaguar’s new lineup, expected to offer over 400 miles of range and priced around £130,000.

The rebranding has sparked controversy, with critics labeling it as ‘woke’ due to promotional materials featuring androgynous models and a new logo design. Jaguar’s managing director, Rawdon Glover, defends the strategy, emphasizing the need to distinguish Jaguar from traditional automotive brands and attract a wealthier customer base.

Leaked images of the Design Vision Concept reveal a bold pink exterior, stirring further debate among enthusiasts and industry experts.  We’re not sure if these are real.  We hope not.  It’s really bad rendering if it is.

The official reveal is scheduled for 8:00 PM EST, where more details about Jaguar’s future direction are anticipated.

Twitter Conversations

Audio Podcast Updates

Sneak Preview Week

We took Jaguar’s reimagined ad and reimagined it ourselves—not to outshine their creative team, but to explore what might resonate more with their audience. The response has been overwhelmingly positive, not because we crafted something extraordinary, but because it seems people are craving something different than what Jaguar delivered. It’s less about our execution and more about the underlying hunger for a message that feels authentic, connected, and less polarizing than their current direction.

Read My Original Critique

 

Re-Imagined Campaign

I spent a couple hours on the launch day fuming.  So rather than just hate on what Jaguar had released, I did some re-imaginging myself.  It’s not perfect, but it cost $50 million less and was done in about 4 hours.

View My Re-Imagination

 

Final Thoughts

As the day wraps up, one thing will be clear: Jaguar’s rebrand and unveiling will have sparked a storm of reactions—some celebrating bold moves, others questioning their choices. Whether you see this as a step into the future or a stumble into confusion, it’s undeniable that Jaguar has captured attention.

For a legacy brand navigating reinvention, the road is never smooth. Today has shown us the power of perception, the weight of legacy, and the high stakes of daring to do something different. Time will tell if this marks the beginning of a new golden era for Jaguar or a lesson in what not to do.

Thanks for joining me on this journey. If nothing else, it’s been an exhilarating ride—just like a Jaguar should be.

Why I Love Conspiracy Theories (Even If I Don’t Believe Them)

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

Let me start by saying this: I don’t actually believe most conspiracy theories. That’s not what draws me in. What I find fascinating about them is the sheer creativity—the way they challenge the obvious and spin alternate realities that feel like mental mazes. It’s like looking at the world through a kaleidoscope where every twist reveals a new pattern, even if you know deep down it’s just light bending a certain way.

For me, conspiracy theories are less about truth and more about the “what ifs.” What if there was something bigger going on behind the scenes? What if that strange, unrelated event wasn’t a coincidence? It’s not that I’m putting stock in these ideas, but I love the mental exercise of exploring them. People have this incredible ability to take a handful of random facts—or even just rumors—and weave them into complex, often wildly imaginative stories. I can’t help but appreciate the creativity and effort behind that, even if the premise itself is far-fetched.

Take something like the moon landing hoax theory. Do I believe it? Not for a second. But I’m intrigued by the questions people ask to support their case. Why were there no stars in the photos? How did the flag wave with no wind? It’s not the answers that hook me—it’s the act of questioning. It’s the challenge to conventional thinking, the audacity to say, “What if the entire world has been fooled?” There’s a rebellious spark in that line of thinking, and I find it kind of thrilling, even when I know it’s baseless.

I think conspiracy theories resonate with something deeper in human nature: our desire for stories and meaning. Life is messy, random, and often hard to make sense of. Conspiracies offer a tidy explanation for the chaos, even if it’s pure fiction. They make people feel like they’ve uncovered a secret truth, like they’re one step ahead of the crowd. And while that can lead to dangerous places when taken too seriously, it’s also a fascinating reflection of how our minds work. We crave connection, patterns, and purpose—even if we have to invent them.

For me, dipping into the world of conspiracy theories is a form of mental play. It’s like reading a really engrossing sci-fi novel or watching a thriller with an over-the-top plot twist. I don’t have to buy into it to enjoy the ride. It’s the exploration that keeps me coming back—the idea that, for just a moment, I can imagine a world where nothing is as it seems.

So no, I’m not stocking up on tinfoil hats or digging a bunker in my backyard. But I’ll happily spend an evening watching a documentary on the flat earth movement or scrolling through forums debating Bigfoot sightings. Not because I believe, but because it’s fun to wonder. What if?

The Power of “We” in Presenting Creative Work

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

Presenting creative work is a collaborative team effort. Presenting from the “We” approach not only ensures that clients understand the breadth and depth of contributions from the entire team, but also fosters an environment where all members of the team share responsibility, be it for success or failure.

Over the years, running agencies and leading creative teams has taught me many invaluable lessons. One of the most important lesson involves presenting creative work as a collective effort—always as a “We,” never as an “I.” This is not just a matter of semantics; it’s a principle that has shaped my approach to leadership, collaboration, and client relationships. Through decades of managing teams and interacting with clients, I’ve come to believe that this philosophy is important for both fostering internal cohesion and building long-term success.

Furthermore, by emphasizing collective effort, agencies protect themselves from concentrating praise or blame on a single individual, which can skew perceptions, damage morale, and distort the reality of the creative process.

The Importance of Team Dynamics in Creative Work

Marketing and advertising are inherently collaborative disciplines. The process of bringing a campaign to life involves multiple layers of strategy, creativity, production, and execution. Rarely, if ever, does a successful campaign emerge from the mind of one individual. Instead, it is shaped and refined by contributions from strategists, designers, copywriters, media planners, and project managers, among others.

Rosser Reeves, one of the great advertising minds of the 20th century, acknowledged the team aspect in his work, stating that “I alone did not write this book. It was written by a body of dedicated men and women”​. This sentiment holds true across the creative industries: individual brilliance may spark an idea, but it is the collective effort that refines it into something great.

Accountability and Shared Responsibility

When creative work is presented from a “We” perspective, it helps distribute both the credit for success and the responsibility for failure across the entire team. This is not just about protecting individuals from blame; it ensures a more realistic appraisal of the complex processes that lead to an outcome. As Reeves argues in Reality in Advertising, “Advertising is only one of many factors that can cause sales to rise or fall”​. Similarly, the success or failure of a marketing campaign can be attributed to a multitude of interconnected factors. By framing it as a team effort, the focus shifts to improving overall processes rather than assigning individual blame.

Neil McElroy, a pioneer in brand management, emphasized the importance of team dynamics in his famous 1931 memo: he called for the creation of brand management teams, acknowledging that the success of a brand depended on the contributions of various individuals working toward a common goal​. This call for teamwork extends to how creative work should be presented to clients.

Lesson 1: Creativity Is a Team Sport

Early in my career, I learned that no piece of creative work is truly the product of a single person. Sure, someone might have the initial spark of an idea, but it’s the collaboration of many minds that transforms that spark into something meaningful and impactful. Whether it’s a strategist’s insight, a designer’s flair, or a project manager’s organization, every piece of the puzzle is essential. Presenting creative work from a “We” perspective underscores this reality.

I’ve seen too many situations where someone—whether it’s a creative director or a junior team member—was either unfairly praised or blamed for an entire project. It didn’t take long for me to realize that this not only distorts the truth but also erodes team morale. Over time, I adopted the mindset that I wasn’t just leading a collection of individuals; I was guiding a creative ecosystem where each part plays a vital role. If the project succeeds, it’s because we succeeded together; if it fails, we all share responsibility and learn from it.

Lesson 2: Shared Responsibility Prevents Burnout and Egos

One of the more subtle benefits of the “We” approach is that it helps keep egos in check while preventing burnout. In the early days of running an agency, I sometimes saw individuals take on too much, trying to be the star or feel the weight of the entire project on their shoulders. This is an unsustainable model. When someone shoulders all the credit or blame, it sets them—and the team—up for failure in the long run. It took a few of these experiences for me to realize that shared responsibility fosters a healthier work environment.

Neil McElroy, in his famous memo on brand management, advocated for creating teams that could take ownership of a project without placing the burden on any one person​. I found this advice invaluable as I built teams over the years. By emphasizing that we succeed or fail as a unit, I helped create a culture where people supported each other, knowing that their contributions were valued and recognized.

Lesson 3: Clients Trust Teams, Not Solo Acts

From a client’s perspective, understanding that an entire team is behind a project builds trust and confidence. It tells them that the agency they hired is resilient, capable, and has a diverse range of talents working toward their goals. I’ve sat in countless meetings where clients were visibly reassured to know that multiple experts—not just a single creative mind—had worked on their campaign. They knew they were getting a well-rounded, thought-out solution, not the brainchild of one person.

In my experience, presenting a unified front strengthens the client relationship. I’ve seen what happens when clients believe all the ideas come from one person—they tend to hold that individual responsible for every outcome, good or bad. But when you reinforce that the work is a collaborative effort, clients are more likely to appreciate the process and the depth of thought that has gone into it. This also means that when challenges arise, the team can tackle them collectively rather than relying on one person to fix everything.

Lesson 4: The Creative Process Is Messy—And That’s Okay

As someone who has spent years immersed in creative processes, I’ve learned that they are rarely linear. Ideas bounce around, evolve, and are shaped by numerous hands and minds. When you present work as a solo effort, you hide the messy—and essential—nature of creativity. But when you present work as a product of the team, you allow for a more realistic understanding of how ideas are born and refined.

I’ve found that acknowledging the collective effort also helps manage client expectations. It conveys that creativity is a process, not an instant act of brilliance. I’ve often referred back to this idea in meetings, reminding clients that what they see is the result of a collaborative effort that includes not just the “big idea” but also the practical aspects of bringing it to life—logistics, execution, revisions. It demystifies the process in a way that ultimately builds trust.

Lesson 5: “We” Fosters Long-Term Success

As I reflect on my years of leading creative teams, I’ve come to see that the “We” approach fosters long-term success, both within the agency and with clients. Internally, it creates a more supportive, collaborative culture where people feel valued for their contributions. Externally, it builds stronger client relationships because clients see the agency as a cohesive unit, capable of delivering thoughtful, well-rounded solutions.

I’ve always believed that the best work happens when people feel part of something larger than themselves. This perspective aligns with what marketing guru Wally Olins wrote about the need for brands to foster human connections​. The same applies to creative teams—when they feel connected to each other and to the project, the work is always better.

Key Takeaways

  • Creative work in marketing and advertising should always be presented from a “We” perspective to reflect the collaborative nature of the process.
  • A collective approach distributes credit and blame fairly, preventing individual team members from being singled out.
  • Clients gain confidence from knowing that a team of experts, not just one individual, is working on their behalf.
  • Presenting work as a team effort helps foster a culture of inclusion and collaboration within the agency, leading to better outcomes.

My Mind-Blowing Experience with ChatGPT’s New Voice Model

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

I’ve always been intrigued by AI, especially the growing capabilities of language models like ChatGPT. They’ve been fun to play around with, helpful at times, but more often a source of curiosity than anything world-changing. But recently, I encountered something that took me from being entertained to being downright stunned—the new ChatGPT voice model.

This isn’t just another step in AI development. It’s a full-on “HER” moment—the kind of experience that takes a leap beyond the screen and gets you thinking deeply about the future. Over the last hour, I found myself having what felt like a real conversation with AI, one that didn’t just mimic human interaction but captured the flow and nuance of writing in a way I hadn’t seen before.

And that, right there, is the big shift.

A New Type of Writing Partner

Let’s be clear: this isn’t about ChatGPT suddenly taking over all of my writing. It’s not about handing over the reins and saying, “Okay, AI, you do all the work.” What’s truly exciting—and a little terrifying—is that this tool has now become the ultimate research partner, a co-writer that can assist at lightning speed, with access to the vast expanse of human knowledge.

Imagine having a conversation with someone who knows everything ever written but still leaves the final decisions to you. It speeds up the process of thinking, structuring, and writing in ways I never thought possible. And while the software is still a little glitchy here and there (it’s not perfect, and that’s okay), what we’re witnessing is an evolutionary leap—both in the technology itself and in how we, as humans, will engage with information, creativity, and productivity.

More Than a Gimmick

In previous iterations, AI was often seen as a cool gimmick—a flashy tool that could help you generate ideas but wasn’t a replacement for the real deal. That view is quickly becoming outdated. This is no longer a novelty, not just a toy for experimenting with quirky conversations. It’s becoming an integral part of how we write, how we think, and how we’ll solve problems going forward.

And that’s where things get exciting—and a little scary. There’s something almost unnerving about the way these models have evolved. It’s not just about convenience; it’s about altering the way we engage with our work. When you start having conversations with an AI that feel less like commands and more like collaboration, you begin to realize just how much the game has changed.

The Responsibility of Using AI

But as with any powerful tool, there’s a responsibility to think about how we’re going to use this. AI isn’t a magic wand that will take over the hard stuff for us. At the end of the day, it’s still math—a series of algorithms designed to mimic writing and conversation. It doesn’t know what it’s saying. It doesn’t understand meaning the way we do. And that means we’re still in control.

This technology can help eliminate those frustrating gaps in research, streamline the writing process, and give us back precious time to focus on the creative and strategic parts of our work. But as we move forward, we have to remember that the final decisions still rest with us. We are the ones guiding the conversation, shaping the ideas, and ensuring the integrity of what’s being created.

Think of it like this: we are the ultimate player controllers, guiding the AI through a game of knowledge and creativity. It can go far, it can speed up the journey, but it’s still the human element that makes the final call.

The Future of Creativity with AI

So, where does that leave us? In a place of both great excitement and a touch of fear. Yes, this new voice model will fundamentally change how we approach writing, research, and collaboration. It will give us more time to think, create, and execute ideas that we might not have had the bandwidth for before. But it also forces us to confront the ethical and creative challenges that come with wielding this kind of tool.

As we stand on the edge of this new frontier, we need to think about how we’ll use AI responsibly. How we’ll harness its potential without letting it take over. How we’ll ensure that, even in the midst of this technological revolution, we keep human intelligence and creativity at the center of the process.

I don’t have all the answers, but I do know one thing: This is a turning point. And while it’s tempting to be either overly excited or completely terrified, I think the best way forward is to embrace the possibilities while keeping our hands firmly on the controls. After all, this is only the beginning. What comes next is up to us.

Can ChatGPT and Large Language Models Really Think?

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

It’s an exciting time to witness how fast artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing, particularly with the rise of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. These models have revolutionized everything from customer service to content creation, but there’s a critical question that lingers in the background: Can AI actually think?

At first glance, it might seem like they do. After all, LLMs can engage in conversations, answer complex questions, and even write poetry. But despite their apparent “intelligence,” the reality is that these models are not thinking. They don’t have thoughts, emotions, or intentions. They’re essentially sophisticated pattern-recognition machines, operating based on the mathematical probabilities of which word should come next.

The Mechanics of a Language Model

Let’s break down how a large language model like ChatGPT operates. These AI systems have been trained on massive datasets of text from books, articles, websites, and more. Through this training, they learn the statistical relationships between words and phrases.

When you ask a model like ChatGPT a question, it’s not “thinking” about the answer. It’s running algorithms to predict which word comes next based on the patterns it’s seen during its training. There’s no cognition involved. The model is, quite literally, running millions of calculations to determine which word, phrase, or sentence has the highest likelihood of being the “right” answer given the input it received.

As AI researcher Gary Marcus puts it: “A system like GPT-3 generates text not because it understands the world or has some internal mental model but because it has seen lots and lots of sentences before and can pattern match.” The result is a machine that’s incredibly good at seeming like it knows what it’s talking about, but in reality, it’s just stringing together statistically probable word sequences.

Is This Really Different from Humans?

Now, let’s pause and consider something interesting. When we, as humans, speak or write, how different is our process? If you’ve ever been deep into writing something—maybe an essay, an email, or even just a text message—you’ve probably noticed moments where the words seem to flow out of you naturally. You aren’t consciously thinking about every individual word or grammar rule, but you instinctively know what comes next.

We’ve been trained by life in much the same way an AI model is trained on data. We learn language through experience, and over time, we become fluent in its patterns and structures. It’s almost automatic—second nature.

David Chalmers, a philosopher and cognitive scientist, has mused on this: “Human language production, in many ways, is automatic. We are largely pattern-matching, following rules that we’ve internalized over a lifetime.” So, when we speak or write, are we really thinking in a fundamentally different way than an AI model, or are we just tapping into a well of learned experiences, following the “rules” we’ve internalized?

The Key Difference: Sentience and Creativity

While both humans and LLMs rely on pattern recognition to an extent, there is a fundamental difference—sentience. As humans, we have the ability to be self-aware, to think consciously about abstract ideas, and most importantly, to come up with new ideas.

AI models, despite their impressive capabilities, are fundamentally limited to remixing and reassembling the information they’ve been trained on. They can’t generate truly novel ideas that haven’t been introduced into their datasets. They don’t have that spark of creativity or insight that leads to groundbreaking discoveries or inventions.

As Yann LeCun, a pioneer in AI, said, “Current AI systems are far from being capable of reasoning about the world the way humans can.” AI can analyze vast amounts of data, spot patterns, and make connections that might elude us—but it does this in a purely mechanical way. When it comes to creating something entirely new, the machine falls short.

So, Can AI Think?

The answer is no, not in the way we typically understand “thinking.” AI models don’t have thoughts, they don’t experience emotions, and they can’t consciously reflect on the world around them. They predict, process, and output based on probabilities. There’s no internal dialogue, no ‘aha!’ moment, no flash of inspiration.

Human cognition, on the other hand, while often driven by learned patterns and automatic responses, has the capacity for creativity. We are sentient beings with the ability to dream up entirely new ideas, theories, and concepts. We don’t just follow the data; we can imagine beyond it.

Where AI Excels (and Where It Doesn’t)

To be clear, this isn’t to downplay the incredible achievements of AI. These models excel in many areas. They can process and analyze information at speeds that are unimaginable for humans. They can surface patterns across vast datasets that we might miss. And yes, they can even help us refine our thinking by suggesting new ways to structure ideas or explore unfamiliar territory.

But, as Hod Lipson, a leading researcher in AI and robotics, noted: “AI can be creative in the sense of coming up with unexpected solutions, but it lacks the intrinsic motivation to pursue a goal or understand why a solution is important.” The machine might produce something that looks creative, but without an underlying understanding of why it matters, it’s not truly innovative in the human sense.

The Uniquely Human Advantage

So, what’s left for us humans? What do we have that these powerful machines don’t?

Sentience and true creativity. The ability to reflect, to wonder, to dream. Not all of us are going to invent the next breakthrough technology, write a world-changing novel, or devise a solution to a global crisis. But every human has the potential to come up with something genuinely new, something that no machine—no matter how sophisticated—could ever create on its own.

That’s the core of what separates us from AI. While machines can process, predict, and output information at incredible speeds, they’re stuck in a loop of rehashing what’s already been introduced into their data banks. We can think beyond the data, beyond the patterns, and generate something entirely novel.

In the words of AI ethicist Kate Crawford, “AI isn’t about human intelligence; it’s about human mimicry.” And that mimicry, no matter how convincing, doesn’t hold a candle to the real thing.

Final Thoughts: Thinking vs. Processing

At the end of the day, it’s important to recognize the strengths and limitations of both humans and machines. AI models like ChatGPT can help us organize information, see patterns, and suggest new directions—but they can’t think or create like we can. The next big idea, the next groundbreaking innovation, will always come from a human mind—not from a machine running through its algorithms.

Our sentience, our ability to conceive new ideas, and our capacity for deep, reflective thought are what make us unique. That, ultimately, is the difference between us and the machines we build. We’re more than processors—we’re creators, dreamers, and inventors. And no matter how advanced AI becomes, that will always be our defining edge.

The Power of Voting

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

From a young age, politics has been in my blood. I remember being that curious kid, sitting around the dinner table, eagerly listening to the grown-ups talk about elections, policies, and the future of our country. I didn’t always understand everything they said, but I knew that these conversations mattered. They were the building blocks of the democracy we live in today. I was drawn to these discussions not out of a desire to win arguments, but because I believed that the decisions we make together shape our nation.

As I grew older, my passion for understanding our political system deepened. I pursued a degree in political science, hoping to not only understand the mechanics of government but also to approach it with the same open heart that I had as a boy. Back then, politics felt like something people only talked about in short bursts during election cycles. It was a conversation you’d have every few years, and then life would go on.

Today, the world looks very different. Politics is no longer something we can tune in and out of—it’s constant, it’s everywhere, and it’s overwhelming. The 24/7 news cycle, social media, and endless debates can make it feel like we’re drowning in political noise. But here’s the thing: while politics may feel all-consuming right now, we must remember that voting is still the most powerful tool we have to make a difference. Voting is how we reclaim our ability to focus on our daily lives while ensuring that the right leaders are steering the ship.

The power of voting lies in its simplicity. It’s the moment where we each get to decide who has the better ideas, who has the clearest vision, and which candidate truly represents the interests of our country. Every vote is a small but significant act of revolution, a way to steer the course of our nation without violence, without anger, but with a pen and a ballot.

As President Franklin D. Roosevelt once said, “Nobody will ever deprive the American people of the right to vote except the American people themselves, and the only way they could do this is by not voting.” In a time when it feels like everything is spiraling out of control, voting is our anchor. It’s the one thing we can each do to make sure our voices are heard and that our country reflects the will of its people.

Yes, the nation is divided. But that’s not a reason to shy away from our civic duty—it’s the exact reason we should embrace it. The beauty of democracy is that we are blessed with the opportunity to vote, to participate in a peaceful revolution every two to four years. This isn’t about hating someone for their ideas or their beliefs. As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. reminded us, “We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” It’s okay to disagree on policy or personality, but we must never allow those disagreements to turn into hatred.

We are all entitled to our beliefs, and we all have a duty to engage in the political process. Our candidates are meant to represent us so that we can return to our lives knowing that we’ve done our part. Voting isn’t just about supporting a candidate; it’s about supporting the very foundation of our democracy. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The government you elect is the government you deserve.” This is why we vote—not just to choose our leaders, but to choose the direction of our future.

So, as we approach the upcoming election, let’s remember the power of the vote. Let’s recognize that our nation’s strength lies in the fact that we can come together, even in disagreement, to shape our shared future. Let’s celebrate that we have the freedom to choose, and let’s use that freedom wisely.

Voting is our civic duty. It’s our chance to make our voices heard, to shape the future, and to engage in a peaceful revolution. So when the time comes, don’t stand by. Step up, cast your vote, and be part of the change. The world is watching us—let’s show them what true democracy looks like.

Some of my closest friends stand firmly on the opposite side of the political spectrum, and I love them dearly for it. Our differing views haven’t weakened our bond; they’ve strengthened it. We’ve had countless debates and spirited discussions, but through it all, we’ve maintained respect, understanding, and a deep appreciation for each other’s perspectives. It’s a reminder that our democracy thrives on diversity of thought, and that meaningful relationships can and should transcend politics. Disagreeing on policies or candidates doesn’t mean we can’t find common ground in our shared values and mutual respect.

There’s too much hate in the world right now. Instead of compassion, it feels like people’s default reaction is revenge or retribution. We’ve stopped seeing each other’s humanity, focusing more on differences than the things that connect us. It’s as if we’ve forgotten that behind every belief, every opinion, there’s a person—a fellow human being with hopes, dreams, and struggles, just like us. We need to take a step back, breathe, and remember that empathy and understanding are what truly make us strong. It’s time to bring back the compassion that seems to be slipping away.

My Political Statement for the Season:

My contribution to this election cycle is to remind you to vote—no matter who you choose. I don’t care if it’s for one candidate, the other, or someone else entirely. If you’re stuck and can’t decide, hey, write in your mom. And if you don’t think she’d be up for the job, feel free to write in my dad—he’s pretty great, and I’m sure he’d be up for the challenge. I think he’s bored in retirement. Just make sure you get out there and vote because that’s what truly matters.

Check out our new bipartisan T-shirts, perfect for those who believe in the power of voting without the drama. These tees are about as political as I’ll get online—designed to celebrate democracy and encourage everyone to make their voice heard, no matter who they support. Grab yours today and show the world that the revolution starts at the polls.

 

A Prescription for Marketing Success

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

When you think about your health, you probably envision your local hospital—a place that’s equipped to handle every kind of ailment, from a minor scrape to complex surgeries. Yet, despite all those services available, you usually only visit the hospital for one specific reason. Maybe it’s a cold that won’t go away or a pesky knee pain that flares up after your morning run. Regardless, you trust your doctor to address your immediate concern and advise you on the next steps to keep your entire body in good shape for years to come.

This scenario is strikingly similar to how you should view your relationship with a marketing agency. Just as a hospital is there for your health, an agency is there for your business’s well-being. And while an agency can provide a full range of services—everything from branding to SEO to video production—you likely approach them with a specific pain point in mind. Maybe it’s a website that isn’t converting or a social media campaign that’s falling flat. Whatever it is, your agency should not only fix the issue but also take the time to look at the bigger picture and offer advice on how to keep your business healthy for the long term.

More Than a Quick Fix

Think about your last doctor’s visit. Maybe you went in for a sore throat, but a good doctor wouldn’t stop there. They might ask about your diet, remind you of an upcoming vaccination, or suggest a cholesterol test. They’re thinking holistically—how your sore throat fits into your overall health picture and how you can avoid bigger issues down the line.

A good agency works in much the same way. Sure, you might come in because your paid search ads are underperforming, but a full-service agency won’t stop at the symptoms. They’ll take a holistic view of your marketing ecosystem. Maybe they’ll suggest a revamp of your website’s user experience to improve conversions or recommend content strategies that build your brand over time. They’re not just treating your pain point—they’re ensuring your business thrives in the long run.

You Don’t Need Every Procedure

Now, let’s be real. If you walked into a hospital and said, “Give me every test, treatment, and procedure you offer,” you’d be bankrupt in no time. The same goes for marketing services. You don’t need every service all at once. It’s important to prioritize based on your current business needs and long-term goals.

A good agency, like a good doctor, will help you prioritize. Maybe you don’t need an expensive branding overhaul right now, but improving your email marketing could bring a quick and measurable boost to your bottom line. A full-service agency can identify what’s most pressing today, what can wait, and what will keep your business healthy for the future.

Trusting the Experts

Trust is the foundation of any relationship with a doctor, and it should be the same with your agency. You trust your doctor because they have years of experience and expertise that you don’t. They know the latest treatments and understand the best ways to keep you healthy. Similarly, a good agency is steeped in the latest marketing trends, technology, and data. They know what works, what doesn’t, and what’s coming next.

When your doctor tells you that you need surgery, you trust that it’s the right move for your health. Likewise, when your agency tells you that your website needs a complete overhaul, it’s because they have the knowledge and experience to know it’s the right move for your business. Yes, there are economic factors at play in both scenarios, but a good doctor and a good agency always have your best interests at heart.

A Holistic Approach to Your Business Health

At the end of the day, you want both your doctor and your agency to take a holistic approach. You want a healthcare plan that not only fixes the problems but also prevents future issues, just like you want a marketing plan that doesn’t just solve immediate challenges but sets your business up for long-term success.

So, when you’re looking for an agency, think of it like finding the right hospital. Look for one that offers a wide range of services and expertise but knows how to prioritize based on your current needs. Trust them to diagnose your pain points and to guide you through the options that will keep your business healthy and thriving for years to come.

Just like you wouldn’t trust your health to just anyone, don’t trust your business to just any agency. Make sure you have experts who care about the bigger picture, just like your doctor does for your body.

Your business deserves full-service care, and a great agency can provide just that.

Your Meetings Suck. Use the 20/50 Rule To Make Them Awesome.

1024 682 Michael Kraabel

I’ve always wondered how many people out there have ever argued that meetings are the key to their personal and professional productivity. I suspect there are very few. Don’t get me wrong, I actually value face-to-face meetings more than anything else in the world when it comes to knowledge transfer and getting alignment on important issues. In fact, I find myself ignoring emails and phone calls much more in favor of meetings. But if I’m in meetings all day, when does the actual work get done?

Meetings are Unproductive

For most job roles, a meeting means sitting around a table with a group of people that are all waiting for their turn to speak. We’ve all been in that situation before (likely on both sides). Look around the room about 50 minutes into a 60 minute meeting and you’ll likely observe most people drifting off, checking email, or “pretending” to check email on their phone.

Research says you should ban laptops and sitting down, set a timer, and have silence breaks if you want meetings that accomplish anything ( FastCompany).

Put a goldfish in a small fish bowl and it will remain small. Put them in a large aquarium and that same fish will continue to grow until it fills the tank (or so I might have read once on the Internet). The same goes for meetings. If you schedule an hour, the meeting will last an hour. If you schedule a 30 minute meeting, you’ll be rushed, but it will finish at the half hour mark (or beyond). For this reason, we believe it’s important to keep meetings in a fishbowl … um, we mean, purposefully short.

The 20/50 Model for Meeting Scheduling

In 2008, when we started Project Unplug, we developed a model that would take/give back 10 minutes from every hour long meeting, which ensured people would have the time to digest the current topic before rushing to the next task or meeting. Rather than schedule an hour meeting, we would schedule (or just run it)them for 50. With our days filled with meetings, this simple trick ended up giving our team a free hour each day to recharge, refocus, and reengage themselves in the subjects being discussed in meetings.

If you were to apply this same approach and methodology for half hour meetings, your organization could achieve massive gains in productivity. People will be less resentful of long meeting time and will likely work better together to ensure all topics are given their best attention, knowing they won’t have to rush from one topic to the next trying to play catch up all day.

Giving your team free time to reflect allows them to come in with fresh minds for the next meeting, or at least a decompression period before they go back to their desk to complete the rest of their work.

Let’s Review the Math:

  1. 15 Minute Stand-up Meeting = ok
  2. 20 Minute Discussion, 10 Minutes Free = 0k
  3. 50 Minute Meeting, 10 Minutes Free = ok
  4. All Day Planning/Training Sessions Without Breaks = What’s wrong with you?

How Does This Apply to You:

Let’s have a little fun with numbers and see just how much time you can save by adopting the 20/50 rule in your meetings. You might be wondering, why are we crunching these numbers? Well, if there’s one thing we’ve all learned, it’s that time is our most precious resource. And if meetings are notorious for one thing, it’s stealing that precious time—time that could be better spent on creative projects, personal growth, or just taking a well-deserved break.

Imagine for a moment that you work a standard five-day week, with anywhere between four to five hours of meetings each day. That’s a lot of time sitting around a table, staring at screens, or waiting for your turn to speak. Now, what if we could give you some of that time back? That’s where the 20/50 rule comes in—a simple yet brilliant tweak to your meeting schedule that frees up ten minutes from every hour-long meeting and five minutes from every half-hour meeting. It might not sound like much at first, but let’s break it down.

If you’re just starting out in your career and plan to work until you’re 65, adopting this rule could save you somewhere between 573 and 717 days over your career. Yes, you read that right—days, not hours! That’s nearly two full years of time that you could spend traveling the world, mastering a new skill, or even writing that novel you’ve always dreamed about.

For those of you in the middle of your career, say around age 35, you’re looking at saving 400 to 500 days by the time you retire. That’s enough time to finally take those extended vacations, pursue a passion project, or invest in some serious personal development. Imagine the difference an extra year and a half could make in your life!

And if you’re 50 and starting to count down the years to retirement, the 20/50 rule could still gift you an extra 200 to 250 days. Think of it as your early retirement plan—a few more months to enjoy the things you love, mentor the next generation, or simply kick back and relax.

Why do these calculations? Because they remind us that even the smallest adjustments in how we manage our time can lead to massive gains in productivity and quality of life. Meetings may be necessary, but they don’t have to eat up all your time. By adopting the 20/50 rule, you’re reclaiming your schedule, one meeting at a time, and turning those minutes into days—days you can use to enrich your career, your relationships, and your life.

10 Other Simple Rules For Productive Meetings

If you’re not in control of the meeting calendar for meetings, here are a few other rules/guidelines we find useful in running productive gatherings:

No Spectators

If someone is in a meeting, they should serve a purpose, or have a purpose for being there. If you find yourself sitting in a room with a bunch of people listening to one or two people do most of the work, start charging them an admission fee and sell them a ticket.

Screens Down

While it’s preference to have zero digital devices in meetings, sometimes they do show up. Make it a habit and a rule that screens should be faced down, laptops closed, and all “alerts” turned off. This will ensure people are focused and not distracted. One person should be responsible for notes and they can have their screen up for that purpose.

Schedule Short Meetings (20/50)

Think to yourself: does this need to be a meeting? One meeting? Two? What do we really need to accomplish? Is this just a meeting to meet? If so, cancel.

Stand Up (people will get tired)

It must be my body showing it’s age, but at a certain point we all stop going to live concerts and don’t enjoy standing for more than 15 minutes without moving around. Let’s use this to our advantage and have more standing/walking meetings. Few people linger around during stand up meetings.

Focus Your Agenda

Have an agenda. Stick to it. If new topics come up, modify the agenda. This simple task will keep people focused on the topics and less focused on CNN alerts.

One Meeting Owner

Each meeting should have a moderator that keeps to the agenda. They should sit in a central location where they can capture each person’s attention with the glance of an eye. This holds the audience accountable.

Forward Thinking. Few Reviews.

Review meetings should be reserved for historical societies and post-vacation discussions. If your meeting is more focused on “review” of material most people already know, cancel it. Flip the model and have the meetings focused only on stuff you’re working towards or future ideas.

End Meeting When It’s Over

It’s probably rude to just get up with a meeting is over, but I find myself doing it all the time. We all know when the meeting “is over,” we sometimes linger to see if anything else will happen. If there’s anytime to ignore your FOMO impulses, it’s at the end of a meeting.

Give Back Time

When a meeting doesn’t need to take the allotted time, don’t fill it. Don’t hold people hostage, it’s considered time-stealing. People will never resent you for saying, “well, we accomplished what we needed, let’s end this meeting.”

End Lists When You Don’t Have 10 Items

No, seriously… we’re done.

Note:

I originally wrote this article back in 2017 and posted it on LinkedIn, only to rediscover it recently. Even after all these years, I still use the 20/50 model, and it’s been a game-changer for my productivity. By sticking to these principles, I’ve gained years of extra time—time that’s been spent on more meaningful work, creative thinking, and, yes, even a little bit of fun. Give it a try; you might just find yourself with more hours in the day than you ever thought possible.

Let’s walk through the calculations step by step manually to determine the time savings using the 20/50 rule.

Assumptions:

  • Workweek: 5 days a week
  • Weeks worked per year: 48 weeks (assuming 4 weeks off for vacation/holidays)
  • Meetings per day: Between 4 to 5 hours

Time Saved per Meeting:

  • For a 30-minute meeting: 10 minutes saved
  • For a 60-minute meeting: 10 minutes saved

Time Saved per Day:

  • Minimum Scenario (4 hours of meetings/day):
    • 8 half-hour meetings per day: 8×10 minutes8 \times 10 \text{ minutes} = 80 minutes saved per day
  • Maximum Scenario (5 hours of meetings/day):
    • 10 half-hour meetings per day: 10×10 minutes10 \times 10 \text{ minutes} = 100 minutes saved per day

Time Saved per Year:

  • Minimum Scenario:
    • Per week: 80 minutes/day×5 days80 \text{ minutes/day} \times 5 \text{ days} = 400 minutes/week
    • Per year: 400 minutes/week×48 weeks400 \text{ minutes/week} \times 48 \text{ weeks} = 19,200 minutes/year
  • Maximum Scenario:
    • Per week: 100 minutes/day×5 days100 \text{ minutes/day} \times 5 \text{ days} = 500 minutes/week
    • Per year: 500×48500 \times 48 = 24,000 minutes/year

Conversion to Hours and Days:

  • Minimum Scenario:
    • 19,200 minutes/year = 320 hours/year = 13.33 days/year
  • Maximum Scenario:
    • 24,000 minutes/year = 400 hours/year = 16.67 days/year

Career-Length Savings:

  1. New Worker (Age 22 to 65, 43 years of work):
    • Minimum: 320 hours/year×43 years=13,760 hours320 \text{ hours/year} \times 43 \text{ years} = 13,760 \text{ hours}
      • In Days: 13,760/2413,760 / 24 = 573 days
    • Maximum: 400×43=17,200 hours400 \times 43 = 17,200 \text{ hours}
      • In Days: 17,200/2417,200 / 24 = 717 days
  2. Mid-Career (Age 35 to 65, 30 years of work):
    • Minimum: 320×30=9,600 hours320 \times 30 = 9,600 \text{ hours}
      • In Days: 9,600/249,600 / 24 = 400 days
    • Maximum: 400×30=12,000 hours400 \times 30 = 12,000 \text{ hours}
      • In Days: 12,000/2412,000 / 24 = 500 days
  3. 50-Year-Old (Age 50 to 65, 15 years of work):
    • Minimum: 320×15=4,800 hours320 \times 15 = 4,800 \text{ hours}
      • In Days: 4,800/244,800 / 24 = 200 days
    • Maximum: 400×15=6,000 hours400 \times 15 = 6,000 \text{ hours}
      • In Days: 6,000/246,000 / 24 = 250 days

Understanding and Utilizing Brand Archetypes in Branding

1024 576 Michael Kraabel

Brand archetypes are powerful tools that help marketers define and communicate a brand’s personality, purpose, and position. Rooted in Carl Jung’s psychological theories, archetypes represent universal symbols and themes that resonate with people across cultures and time. In branding, these archetypes help focus efforts, ensuring consistency and authenticity in brand messaging and experiences.

The History of Archetypes

The concept of archetypes was developed by Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung in the early 20th century. Jung identified recurring symbols and motifs in human experiences, which he believed stemmed from the collective unconscious—a shared pool of knowledge and experiences. These archetypes manifest in myths, stories, and dreams and embody fundamental human desires, fears, and motivations.

In the context of branding, archetypes serve as a framework to craft a brand’s narrative and personality. By aligning a brand with a specific archetype, marketers can create a consistent and relatable identity that resonates with their target audience.

Key Brand Archetypes and Their Applications

1. The Hero

Traits: Courageous, determined, honorable

The Hero archetype represents brands that inspire through achievement and perseverance. They often embody qualities like bravery, strength, and a desire to improve the world. Hero brands position themselves as the best in their category, striving to make a positive impact.

Examples: Nike, Duracell

Application: Hero brands should focus on messages of empowerment and overcoming challenges. They thrive on stories of triumph and excellence, appealing to consumers’ desire for strength and inspiration.

2. The Outlaw

Traits: Rebellious, unconventional, disruptive

The Outlaw archetype is about breaking the rules and challenging the status quo. These brands are seen as rebellious and provocative, often appealing to those who resist conformity.

Examples: Harley-Davidson, Virgin

Application: Outlaw brands should embrace bold and unconventional strategies. They can use edgy and daring communication styles, emphasizing freedom and innovation.

3. The Magician

Traits: Visionary, transformative, imaginative

Magician brands are all about transformation and creating extraordinary experiences. They inspire change and make the impossible possible.

Examples: Apple, Disney

Application: Magician brands should focus on innovation and creativity. They thrive on delivering unique and transformative products or services that inspire wonder and curiosity.

4. The Lover

Traits: Passionate, intimate, warm

The Lover archetype focuses on emotion, sensuality, and relationships. These brands appeal to the heart and the senses, often associated with luxury, indulgence, and personal connection.

Examples: Chanel, Victoria’s Secret

Application: Lover brands should emphasize aesthetics, beauty, and emotional engagement. Their messaging should evoke feelings of intimacy and pleasure.

5. The Jester

Traits: Fun, playful, light-hearted

Jester brands bring joy and laughter. They don’t take themselves too seriously and aim to entertain and surprise.

Examples: Old Spice, M&M’s

Application: Jester brands should use humor and playfulness in their messaging. They can take risks with unconventional campaigns and encourage a light-hearted, carefree attitude.

6. The Sage

Traits: Wise, knowledgeable, thoughtful

The Sage archetype represents wisdom and insight. These brands seek truth and knowledge, often positioned as experts in their field.

Examples: Google, The New York Times

Application: Sage brands should focus on providing valuable information and insights. They should position themselves as trusted sources of knowledge and thought leadership.

7. The Explorer

Traits: Adventurous, curious, independent

Explorer brands are about discovery and adventure. They appeal to consumers’ desire for freedom and exploration.

Examples: Jeep, The North Face

Application: Explorer brands should emphasize adventure, exploration, and self-discovery. They can use messaging that encourages consumers to break out of their comfort zones and seek new experiences.

8. The Innocent

Traits: Pure, optimistic, simple

The Innocent archetype is about simplicity and optimism. These brands promote happiness, trust, and positivity.

Examples: Coca-Cola, Dove

Application: Innocent brands should focus on positive messaging and simple, wholesome experiences. They can use imagery and language that evokes purity and happiness.

9. The Creator

Traits: Creative, imaginative, expressive

Creator brands focus on innovation and the creative process. They value self-expression and originality.

Examples: Lego, Adobe

Application: Creator brands should encourage creativity and innovation. They can engage their audience through artistic and imaginative content.

10. The Caregiver

Traits: Caring, nurturing, compassionate

The Caregiver archetype is about service and protection. These brands are supportive and nurturing, often associated with health and well-being.

Examples: Johnson & Johnson, TOMS

Application: Caregiver brands should focus on messages of care and support. They can highlight their commitment to helping others and improving lives.

11. The Ruler

Traits: Controlling, authoritative, responsible

Ruler brands are leaders in their domain, often associated with power and control. They seek to create order and stability.

Examples: Mercedes-Benz, Microsoft

Application: Ruler brands should emphasize quality, reliability, and leadership. They can position themselves as authorities and market leaders.

12. The Everyman

Traits: Relatable, humble, down-to-earth

The Everyman archetype is about belonging and connecting with others. These brands are approachable and aim to fit in with everyday life.

Examples: Ikea, Target

Application: Everyman brands should use inclusive and relatable messaging. They should focus on being accessible and straightforward, appealing to the common person.

Utilizing Archetypes in Branding

Creating Brand Consistency

By defining a brand archetype, marketers can ensure that all aspects of branding—from messaging and visuals to customer interactions—align with a consistent personality and voice. This consistency helps build trust and recognition among consumers.

Framework for Decision-Making

Archetypes serve as a valuable framework for determining if something is “on brand.” When faced with decisions about marketing strategies, product development, or partnerships, brands can ask whether the choice aligns with their archetype’s values and characteristics. This helps maintain brand integrity and prevents confusing or conflicting messages.

Archetype Testing and Identification

Brands can use archetype tests to identify their primary and secondary archetypes. These tests typically involve a series of questions that assess a brand’s values, mission, and customer perceptions. The results can help brands understand their core personality and how to communicate it effectively.

Example Questions from an Archetype Test:

  • What are your brand’s core values?
  • How do you want your customers to feel after interacting with your brand?
  • What is your brand’s mission?

These questions help identify the most resonant archetype, guiding the brand’s overall strategy.

Final Thoughts

Brand archetypes provide a powerful framework for building a compelling and authentic brand identity. By aligning with a specific archetype, brands can create a consistent and relatable personality, guiding all aspects of their communication and engagement. This not only helps in creating a focused brand strategy but also ensures that all brand activities resonate with the target audience, fostering stronger connections and loyalty.